PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. FAOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, BTMKX has outperformed FAOAX with an annualized return of 9.42%, while FAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.


BTMKX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.17%
YTD
9.65%
6M
12.05%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
9.42%

FAOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.81%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.65%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
0.00%14.93%4.63%20.01%-24.61%18.90%14.71%27.39%-15.10%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and FAOAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.93

Over the past year, the correlation between BTMKX and FAOAX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.93, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. FAOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOAX
FAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMKXFAOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.95

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-0.37

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

-0.63

+7.79

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the FAOAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and FAOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMKXFAOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

-0.29

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.21

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.44

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.30

+0.09

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum FAOAX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and FAOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXFAOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-60.03%

+26.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-7.29%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-13.99%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-36.50%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-36.50%

+2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-5.87%

+5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-14.56%

+6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.98%

-0.97%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that BTMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXFAOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

0.00%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

4.08%

+8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

9.18%

+5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.72%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

16.69%

-0.02%

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOAX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. FAOAX - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than FAOAX's 8.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.42%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
8.54%8.54%1.33%0.74%0.38%2.12%0.00%1.37%4.64%3.64%1.75%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTMKX and FAOAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTMKX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FAOAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs FAOAX's -60.03%.

BTMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and FAOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer