PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. DFALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMKX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than DFALX's 10.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BTMKX has underperformed DFALX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while DFALX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.


BTMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.62%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.25%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.38%

DFALX

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.09%
YTD
10.25%
6M
13.47%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.29%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
DFALX
DFA Large Cap International Portfolio
10.25%33.60%4.55%17.88%-13.04%12.79%8.13%22.05%-14.15%25.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and DFALX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.99

The correlation between BTMKX and DFALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. DFALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DFALX
DFALX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMKXDFALXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.89

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.63

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.56

-0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

10.00

-2.46

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the DFALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and DFALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMKXDFALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.89

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.61

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.38

+0.02

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum DFALX drawdown of -59.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and DFALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXDFALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-59.76%

+25.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.70%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-13.11%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-27.52%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-35.58%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.60%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-12.01%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.74%

+0.27%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX) at 4.27%. This indicates that BTMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXDFALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.27%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

11.41%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

14.13%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

15.67%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

16.18%

+0.49%

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFALX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. DFALX - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than DFALX's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.43%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%
DFALX
DFA Large Cap International Portfolio
2.74%2.89%3.18%3.24%2.86%3.00%1.88%2.88%3.07%2.55%2.89%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BTMKX and DFALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTMKX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to DFALX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs DFALX's -59.76%.

DFALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and DFALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer