BTM vs. ARKQ
BTM (Bitcoin Depot Inc.) is a stock, while ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) is Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. Over the past year, BTM returned -98.43% vs 73.83% for ARKQ. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTM vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTM achieves a -94.55% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 21.70% return.
BTM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -91.63%
- YTD
- -94.55%
- 6M
- -95.09%
- 1Y
- -98.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 21.70%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 73.83%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
BTM vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTM Bitcoin Depot Inc. | -94.55% | -20.37% | -49.85% | -10.53% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 21.70% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTM and ARKQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTM vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
BTM
ARKQ
BTM vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTM | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.67 | 1.35 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 3.61 | -4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 10.92 | -12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTM | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 2.29 | -2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.66 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
BTM vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTM drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTM and ARKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTM | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.92% | -59.89% | -39.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -98.92% | -20.58% | -78.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.92% | -2.98% | -95.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.23% | -17.23% | -38.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 69.20% | 6.79% | +62.41% |
Volatility
BTM vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM) has a higher volatility of 146.21% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 10.40%. This indicates that BTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTM | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 146.21% | 10.40% | +135.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 173.18% | 24.44% | +148.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.74% | 32.48% | +116.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.37% | 32.22% | +86.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 118.37% | 29.83% | +88.54% |
Dividends
BTM vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
BTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
BTM Bitcoin Depot Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTM and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTM has higher volatility (146.21%) compared to ARKQ (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTM dropped -98.92% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.
ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTM and ARKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer