PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTLSX vs. FSKLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTLSX achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than FSKLX's 3.96% return.


BTLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-7.50%
6M
-7.50%
1Y
-8.44%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*

FSKLX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
3.96%
6M
6.12%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
5.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
-7.50%16.56%18.34%14.75%-39.64%0.71%100.15%45.32%-13.23%-0.69%
FSKLX
Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
3.96%21.95%1.20%13.84%-13.48%9.91%-1.57%16.12%-4.88%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BTLSX and FSKLX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.60

The correlation between BTLSX and FSKLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTLSX vs. FSKLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTLSX
BTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKLX
FSKLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTLSXFSKLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

0.76

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.49

1.15

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.14

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

0.93

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

2.57

-3.50

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTLSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the FSKLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTLSX and FSKLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTLSXFSKLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

0.76

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.48

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.45

-0.10

Drawdowns

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTLSX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than FSKLX's maximum drawdown of -27.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTLSX and FSKLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTLSXFSKLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-27.26%

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-8.64%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.32%

-11.59%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.86%

-24.99%

-30.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.08%

-6.75%

-17.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.64%

-5.14%

-15.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

3.12%

+6.18%

Volatility

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX) at 2.68%. This indicates that BTLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTLSXFSKLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.68%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

7.92%

+7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

10.61%

+9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.13%

11.51%

+17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.39%

11.94%

+16.45%

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTLSX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKLX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTLSX vs. FSKLX - Dividend Comparison

BTLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.18%25.27%102.72%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSKLX
Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
2.49%2.59%2.09%2.31%2.01%2.42%1.32%6.06%2.64%1.69%2.85%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTLSX and FSKLX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTLSX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FSKLX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTLSX dropped -56.26% vs FSKLX's -27.26%.

FSKLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTLSX and FSKLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer