BGELX vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BGELX (Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, BGELX returned 44.49% vs 175.18% for EMEQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGELX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGELX achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 94.29% return.

BGELX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 18.17%
• 1Y: 44.49%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: 5.10%
• 10Y*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: 23.08%
• YTD: 94.29%
• 6M: 103.24%
• 1Y: 175.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BGELX Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund	15.73%	40.75%	-1.91%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	94.29%	69.78%	-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BGELX and EMEQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.78

The correlation between BGELX and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BGELX vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGELX

BGELX Risk / Return Rank: 71
BGELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BGELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BGELX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BGELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BGELX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGELX	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	4.85	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	4.69	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.71	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	9.84	-6.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	36.71	-24.94

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 4.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGELX and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGELX drawdown since its inception was -50.47%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGELX and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGELX	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.47%	-19.99%	-30.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-17.91%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	0.00%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-4.02%	-14.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	4.79%	-0.99%

Volatility

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX) is 0.00%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 19.66%. This indicates that BGELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGELX	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	19.66%	-19.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.64%	33.28%	-17.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.26%	36.39%	-17.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.07%	32.34%	-11.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.62%	32.34%	-10.72%

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGELX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGELX vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

BGELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than EMEQ's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BGELX Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund	1.45%	1.68%	3.52%	4.02%	5.46%	3.08%	1.31%	3.90%	10.14%	1.16%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.42%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGELX and EMEQ in my portfolio?

BGELX and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGELX or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (19.66%) compared to BGELX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGELX dropped -50.47% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.