PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTI vs. XPEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTI vs. XPEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and XPEL, Inc. (XPEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTI achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than XPEL's -9.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BTI has underperformed XPEL with an annualized return of 7.69%, while XPEL has yielded a comparatively higher 47.20% annualized return.


BTI

1D
1.51%
1M
-6.57%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.20%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
34.54%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
7.69%

XPEL

1D
-1.85%
1M
6.19%
YTD
-9.58%
6M
-10.65%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
-16.42%
5Y*
-12.94%
10Y*
47.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTI vs. XPEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
11.67%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%7.95%-4.73%42.97%-49.35%24.40%
XPEL
XPEL, Inc.
-9.58%24.96%-25.83%-10.34%-12.04%32.43%251.95%140.10%335.82%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BTI and XPEL is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2007

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTI:

$136.67B

XPEL:

$1.25B

EPS

BTI:

£4.93

XPEL:

$1.91

PE Ratio

BTI:

9.44

XPEL:

23.57

PEG Ratio

BTI:

0.35

XPEL:

1.64

PS Ratio

BTI:

1.99

XPEL:

2.55

PB Ratio

BTI:

2.13

XPEL:

4.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTI:

£51.48B

XPEL:

$489.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTI:

£42.82B

XPEL:

$208.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTI:

£20.34B

XPEL:

$78.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTI vs. XPEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XPEL
XPEL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XPEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPEL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XPEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPEL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTI vs. XPEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and XPEL, Inc. (XPEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTIXPELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

0.69

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

1.62

+4.27

BTI vs. XPEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the XPEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTI and XPEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTI vs. XPEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTI drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, smaller than the maximum XPEL drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTI and XPEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTIXPELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

-99.44%

+35.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-31.79%

+18.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-71.47%

+57.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-75.62%

+45.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.00%

-75.62%

+19.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-55.49%

+48.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-52.41%

+39.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

13.55%

-7.45%

Volatility

BTI vs. XPEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) is 7.53%, while XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) has a volatility of 11.25%. This indicates that BTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTIXPELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

11.25%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.39%

29.52%

-11.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

40.53%

-17.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

54.79%

-33.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

63.67%

-39.47%

Dividends

BTI vs. XPEL - Dividend Comparison

BTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while XPEL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
4.95%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%
XPEL
XPEL, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BTI vs. XPEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco p.l.c. and XPEL, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
13.54B
117.35M
(BTI) Total Revenue
(XPEL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BTI values in GBP, XPEL values in USD

BTI vs. XPEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between British American Tobacco p.l.c. and XPEL, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
83.4%
43.7%
Portfolio components
BTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

XPEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPEL, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.23M and revenue of 117.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.7%.

BTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

XPEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPEL, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.01M and revenue of 117.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

BTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

XPEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPEL, Inc. reported a net income of 10.35M and revenue of 117.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BTI and XPEL have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPEL has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to BTI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTI dropped -64.11% vs XPEL's -99.44%.

BTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTI and XPEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer