XPEL vs. ENSG
Compare and contrast key facts about XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XPEL or ENSG.
Correlation
The correlation between XPEL and ENSG is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
XPEL vs. ENSG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XPEL:
-0.70
ENSG:
0.27
XPEL:
-0.92
ENSG:
0.54
XPEL:
0.86
ENSG:
1.07
XPEL:
-0.72
ENSG:
0.32
XPEL:
-1.63
ENSG:
0.73
XPEL:
33.43%
ENSG:
9.40%
XPEL:
77.38%
ENSG:
25.12%
XPEL:
-99.77%
ENSG:
-55.56%
XPEL:
-73.41%
ENSG:
-18.54%
Fundamentals
XPEL:
$776.20M
ENSG:
$7.45B
XPEL:
$1.65
ENSG:
$5.12
XPEL:
17.01
ENSG:
25.25
XPEL:
$330.30M
ENSG:
$3.25B
XPEL:
$139.48M
ENSG:
$488.06M
XPEL:
$57.76M
ENSG:
$362.72M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPEL achieves a -32.50% return, which is significantly lower than ENSG's -3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XPEL has outperformed ENSG with an annualized return of 27.06%, while ENSG has yielded a comparatively lower 20.05% annualized return.
XPEL
-32.50%
-11.02%
-37.95%
-53.93%
17.62%
27.06%
ENSG
-3.84%
-0.47%
-12.20%
8.96%
26.89%
20.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XPEL vs. ENSG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XPEL
ENSG
XPEL vs. ENSG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XPEL vs. ENSG - Dividend Comparison
XPEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPEL XPEL, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENSG The Ensign Group, Inc. | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.57% |
Drawdowns
XPEL vs. ENSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPEL drawdown since its inception was -99.77%, which is greater than ENSG's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPEL and ENSG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XPEL vs. ENSG - Volatility Comparison
XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) has a higher volatility of 21.19% compared to The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) at 8.57%. This indicates that XPEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
XPEL vs. ENSG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPEL, Inc. and The Ensign Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
User Portfolios with XPEL or ENSG
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca
technical support
Marcus Crahan