PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTI vs. RGTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTI vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTI achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -5.28% return.


BTI

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.20%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
34.54%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
7.69%

RGTI

1D
1.70%
1M
17.54%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-18.81%
1Y
84.04%
3Y*
152.06%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTI vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
11.67%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%3.00%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-5.28%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BTI and RGTI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTI:

$136.67B

RGTI:

$7.04B

EPS

BTI:

£4.93

RGTI:

-$0.71

PS Ratio

BTI:

1.99

RGTI:

664.25

PB Ratio

BTI:

2.13

RGTI:

12.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTI:

£51.48B

RGTI:

$10.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTI:

£42.82B

RGTI:

$3.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTI:

£20.34B

RGTI:

-$263.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTI vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTI vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTIRGTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

0.96

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

1.47

+4.42

BTI vs. RGTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the RGTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTI and RGTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTI vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTI drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTI and RGTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTIRGTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

-96.89%

+32.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-77.10%

+63.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-78.83%

+65.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-96.89%

+66.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-62.76%

+56.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-58.84%

+45.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

49.98%

-43.88%

Volatility

BTI vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) is 7.53%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 44.79%. This indicates that BTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTIRGTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

44.79%

-37.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.39%

71.15%

-52.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

109.21%

-86.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

128.97%

-107.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

127.17%

-102.97%

Dividends

BTI vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison

BTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
4.95%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BTI vs. RGTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco p.l.c. and Rigetti Computing Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
13.54B
4.40M
(BTI) Total Revenue
(RGTI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BTI values in GBP, RGTI values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BTI and RGTI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to BTI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTI dropped -64.11% vs RGTI's -96.89%.

BTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTI and RGTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer