BTI vs. AMPH
BTI (British American Tobacco p.l.c.) and AMPH (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. BTI operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while AMPH operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BTI returned 7.69%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for AMPH. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTI vs. AMPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTI achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than AMPH's -24.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BTI has outperformed AMPH with an annualized return of 7.69%, while AMPH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.
BTI
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 35.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
AMPH
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -22.19%
- 3Y*
- -24.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
BTI vs. AMPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 11.67% | 65.81% | 35.44% | -19.97% | 14.91% | 7.95% | -4.73% | 42.97% | -49.35% | 24.40% |
AMPH Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -24.98% | -27.88% | -39.97% | 120.74% | 20.31% | 15.81% | 4.25% | -3.07% | 3.43% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTI and AMPH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BTI and AMPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BTI:
$136.67B
AMPH:
$933.34M
BTI:
£4.93
AMPH:
$1.67
BTI:
9.44
AMPH:
12.01
BTI:
0.35
AMPH:
0.64
BTI:
1.99
AMPH:
1.32
BTI:
2.13
AMPH:
1.21
BTI:
£51.48B
AMPH:
$720.53M
BTI:
£42.82B
AMPH:
$341.13M
BTI:
£20.34B
AMPH:
$155.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTI vs. AMPH — Risk / Return Rank
BTI
AMPH
BTI vs. AMPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTI | AMPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.95 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | -0.53 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | -1.07 | +6.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTI vs. AMPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTI drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, smaller than the maximum AMPH drawdown of -74.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTI and AMPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTI | AMPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.11% | -74.05% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -45.25% | +31.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.75% | -74.05% | +60.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -74.05% | +44.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.00% | -74.05% | +18.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -69.09% | +62.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -24.08% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 22.54% | -16.44% |
Volatility
BTI vs. AMPH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) is 7.53%, while Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that BTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTI | AMPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 12.20% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.39% | 46.17% | -27.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.78% | 53.78% | -31.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 45.07% | -23.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 42.71% | -18.51% |
Dividends
BTI vs. AMPH - Dividend Comparison
BTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while AMPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPH Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 4.95% | 5.29% | 8.18% | 9.72% | 7.23% | 7.98% | 7.22% | 6.35% | 8.53% | 4.27% | 3.85% | 4.11% |
Financials
BTI vs. AMPH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco p.l.c. and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BTI vs. AMPH - Profitability Comparison
BTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
AMPH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 70.32M and revenue of 171.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
BTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.
AMPH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.63M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
BTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
AMPH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 6.42M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTI and AMPH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMPH has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to BTI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTI dropped -64.11% vs AMPH's -74.05%.
BTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTI and AMPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer