PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTFAX vs. BGCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTFAX achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly lower than BGCIX's 1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BTFAX has underperformed BGCIX with an annualized return of -0.37%, while BGCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.13% annualized return.


BTFAX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-1.92%
YTD
-1.41%
1Y
1.13%
3Y*
2.21%
5Y*
-1.87%
10Y*
-0.37%
ALL TIME*
0.42%

BGCIX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.10%
YTD
1.44%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
4.13%
ALL TIME*
3.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTFAX
BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund
-1.41%2.96%3.52%2.12%-12.82%-2.18%1.43%4.30%-6.53%2.86%
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
1.44%6.55%8.47%8.87%-8.02%3.48%10.71%7.43%-1.78%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BTFAX and BGCIX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013

0.21

The correlation between BTFAX and BGCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTFAX vs. BGCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTFAX
BTFAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BTFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BTFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BGCIX
BGCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BGCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BGCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTFAXBGCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.57

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

3.19

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

12.87

-12.17

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the BGCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTFAX and BGCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTFAX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, which is greater than BGCIX's maximum drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTFAX and BGCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTFAXBGCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-10.37%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-0.99%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.89%

-2.18%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-9.78%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.78%

-10.37%

-9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.17%

-0.22%

-10.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-1.26%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

0.25%

+1.19%

Volatility

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Volatility Comparison

BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) at 0.49%. This indicates that BTFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTFAXBGCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.49%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

1.07%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

1.36%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

1.91%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

3.14%

+1.70%

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTFAX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BGCIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTFAX vs. BGCIX - Dividend Comparison

BTFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than BGCIX's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGCIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund
5.74%5.83%7.13%3.33%8.25%3.57%9.87%3.75%6.01%1.16%0.00%5.11%
BTFAX
BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund
3.87%4.39%2.71%3.52%2.11%1.69%0.68%3.17%3.38%2.67%4.89%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTFAX and BGCIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTFAX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to BGCIX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTFAX dropped -19.78% vs BGCIX's -10.37%.

BGCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTFAX and BGCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer