BTF vs. SETH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTF is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. Over the past year, BTF returned -32.30% vs -9.93% for SETH. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.

Performance

BTF vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 33.42% return.

BTF

• 1D: -5.41%
• 1M: -16.05%
• YTD: -30.57%
• 6M: -32.41%
• 1Y: -32.30%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SETH

• 1D: 4.65%
• 1M: 20.08%
• YTD: 33.42%
• 6M: 31.49%
• 1Y: -9.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	-30.57%	-12.44%	67.60%	20.71%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	33.42%	-29.41%	-49.59%	-22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and SETH is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023	-0.97

The correlation between BTF and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTF vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF

BTF Risk / Return Rank: 4
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 8
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTF	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	-0.15	-0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	0.26	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.03	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	-0.16	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.99	-0.24	-0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTF vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTF	SETH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.60	-0.15	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.15	-0.47	+0.32

Drawdowns

BTF vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTF	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.50%	-80.74%	+3.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.75%	-56.01%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.59%	-63.35%	+8.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.64%	-54.78%	+15.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.13%	35.76%	-2.63%

Volatility

BTF vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) have volatilities of 9.46% and 9.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTF	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	9.35%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.97%	46.55%	-6.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.18%	68.33%	-14.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.42%	69.50%	-11.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.42%	69.50%	-11.08%

BTF vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTF vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.94%, more than SETH's 11.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	209.94%	146.05%	52.96%	15.98%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	11.53%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTF and SETH in my portfolio?

BTF and SETH have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTF or SETH?

BTF has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to SETH (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, BTF or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -9.93% vs -32.30% for BTF. On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTF or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -9.93% return vs -32.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTF or SETH?

SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTF or SETH?

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 209.94%, compared with 11.53% for SETH.

What is the main difference between BTF and SETH?

They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.95% for SETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.