BTF vs. CBOO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BTF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.

Performance

BTF vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -32.82% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.25% return.

BTF

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: -38.64%
• YTD: -32.82%
• 1Y: -46.74%
• 3Y*: 10.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: -0.26%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	-32.82%	-34.60%
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.25%	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and CBOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

BTF vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF

BTF Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CBOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTF	CBOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	—	—

Drawdowns

BTF vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and CBOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTF	CBOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.50%	-2.34%	-75.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.06%	-1.44%	-54.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.10%	-1.60%	-38.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.74%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTF	CBOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.83%	2.00%	+52.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.30%	2.00%	+56.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.30%	2.00%	+56.30%

BTF vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTF vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 216.64%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	216.64%	146.05%	52.96%	15.98%
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.57%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTF and CBOO in my portfolio?

BTF and CBOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTF or CBOO?

On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTF or CBOO?

CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTF or CBOO?

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 216.64%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.

What is the main difference between BTF and CBOO?

BTF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.69% for CBOO.