BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L
BTEE.L (iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BTEE.L tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD while XDWH.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTEE.L returned 4.70%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for XDWH.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTEE.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTEE.L achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return.
BTEE.L
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 41.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEE.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.58% | 32.82% | -1.69% | 5.84% | -11.88% | -0.57% | 27.55% | 25.56% | -14.84% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTEE.L and XDWH.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BTEE.L and XDWH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTEE.L
XDWH.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BTEE.L
XDWH.L
Basic Materials
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
Energy
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Financial Services
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Industrials
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Technology
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
BTEE.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
BTEE.L
XDWH.L
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTEE.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.41 | 1.11 | +4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.70 | 2.80 | +13.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTEE.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.79 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.32 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.57 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTEE.L drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEE.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEE.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -26.24% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.63% | -10.39% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -19.28% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.29% | -19.28% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -5.82% | +3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -4.98% | -8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 4.12% | -1.65% |
Volatility
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that BTEE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTEE.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 4.80% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 10.77% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 14.57% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 14.18% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 14.97% | +7.53% |
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTEE.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
BTEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEE.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.25% | 0.17% | 0.14% | 0.07% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTEE.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BTEE.L.
BTEE.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BTEE.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for BTEE.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer