BTEC vs. RSPH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) and RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index while RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. Both are passively managed. BTEC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPH.

Performance

BTEC vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BTEC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPH

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: -2.71%
• 6M: -2.70%
• 1Y: 8.70%
• 3Y*: 3.21%
• 5Y*: 2.54%
• 10Y*: 7.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTEC vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	-5.21%

BTEC vs. RSPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BTEC	RSPH
Healthcare	99.4%	98.5%
Industrials	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BTEC vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPH

RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 18
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTEC vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTEC	RSPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.58	—

Drawdowns

BTEC vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTEC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum RSPH drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEC and RSPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTEC	RSPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-40.49%	+40.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.83%	+6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-6.14%	+6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTEC	RSPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	15.46%	-15.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	16.26%	-16.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	17.72%	-17.72%

BTEC vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTEC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTEC vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison

BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF	0.73%	0.70%	0.71%	0.66%	0.64%	0.50%	0.51%	0.54%	0.53%	0.47%	0.48%	0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BTEC or RSPH?

On fees, RSPH is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTEC or RSPH?

RSPH is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTEC or RSPH?

RSPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

What is the main difference between BTEC and RSPH?

BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index, while RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BTEC and 0.40% for RSPH.