BTEC vs. PSIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) and PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. BTEC is passively managed, while PSIL is actively managed. BTEC charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for PSIL.

Performance

BTEC vs. PSIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BTEC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSIL

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 20.15%
• 6M: 23.74%
• 1Y: 65.52%
• 3Y*: 9.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTEC vs. PSIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	24.95%

BTEC vs. PSIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BTEC	PSIL
Healthcare	99.4%	100.0%
Industrials	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BTEC vs. PSIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIL

PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTEC vs. PSIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTEC	PSIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.42	—

Drawdowns

BTEC vs. PSIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTEC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PSIL drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEC and PSIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTEC	PSIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-92.72%	+92.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-64.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-76.63%	+76.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-76.76%	+76.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTEC	PSIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	41.80%	-41.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	63.15%	-63.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	63.15%	-63.15%

BTEC vs. PSIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTEC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PSIL's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTEC vs. PSIL - Dividend Comparison

BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	8.32%	10.95%	1.49%	0.24%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BTEC or PSIL?

On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTEC or PSIL?

BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTEC or PSIL?

PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

What is the main difference between BTEC and PSIL?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BTEC and 1.00% for PSIL.