BTEC vs. BBH
BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) and BBH (VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index while BBH tracks the MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index. Both are passively managed. BTEC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BBH.
Performance
BTEC vs. BBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBH
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
BTEC vs. BBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF | -4.95% |
BTEC vs. BBH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTEC
BBH
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BTEC
BBH
Industrials
BTEC
BBH
-
Basic Materials
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Communication Services
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Consumer Cyclical
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Consumer Defensive
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Energy
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Financial Services
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Real Estate
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Technology
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Utilities
BTEC
-
BBH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTEC vs. BBH — Risk / Return Rank
BTEC
BBH
BTEC vs. BBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTEC | BBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.39 | — |
Drawdowns
BTEC vs. BBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTEC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BBH drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEC and BBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEC | BBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -72.70% | +72.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.08% | +12.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -20.75% | +20.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.14% | — |
Volatility
BTEC vs. BBH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTEC | BBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 19.10% | -19.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.50% | -21.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 22.18% | -22.18% |
BTEC vs. BBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BBH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTEC vs. BBH - Dividend Comparison
BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.27% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.
BBH has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index, while BBH tracks MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BTEC and 0.35% for BBH.
Find the right allocation for BTEC and BBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer