BTDR vs. CANG
BTDR (Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares) and CANG (Cango Inc.) are both stocks. BTDR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while CANG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, BTDR returned 54.13%/yr vs -18.07%/yr for CANG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTDR vs. CANG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTDR achieves a 64.94% return, which is significantly higher than CANG's -78.00% return.
BTDR
- 1D
- 5.84%
- 1M
- 37.27%
- YTD
- 64.94%
- 6M
- 54.08%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 54.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANG
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -52.24%
- YTD
- -78.00%
- 6M
- -72.27%
- 1Y
- -87.31%
- 3Y*
- -18.07%
- 5Y*
- -17.24%
- 10Y*
- —
BTDR vs. CANG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTDR Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares | 64.94% | -48.27% | 119.78% | -1.40% |
CANG Cango Inc. | -78.00% | -31.82% | 331.37% | -12.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTDR and CANG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BTDR and CANG shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BTDR:
$4.32B
CANG:
$118.34M
BTDR:
-$2.23
CANG:
-$10.61
BTDR:
5.65
CANG:
0.05
BTDR:
5.91
CANG:
0.08
BTDR:
$739.06M
CANG:
$2.32B
BTDR:
$25.18M
CANG:
-$783.34M
BTDR:
$59.65M
CANG:
-$1.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTDR vs. CANG — Risk / Return Rank
BTDR
CANG
BTDR vs. CANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) and Cango Inc. (CANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTDR | CANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.76 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | -0.99 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | -1.64 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTDR | CANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | -0.86 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.22 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
BTDR vs. CANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTDR drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum CANG drawdown of -91.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTDR and CANG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTDR | CANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -91.77% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.89% | -88.04% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.52% | -91.77% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.16% | -91.75% | +62.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.72% | -59.79% | +16.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.76% | 53.31% | -10.55% |
Volatility
BTDR vs. CANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) is 31.03%, while Cango Inc. (CANG) has a volatility of 39.70%. This indicates that BTDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTDR | CANG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.03% | 39.70% | -8.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.71% | 90.51% | -21.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.30% | 102.07% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 122.86% | 82.80% | +40.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.86% | 83.81% | +39.05% |
Dividends
BTDR vs. CANG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTDR nor CANG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTDR Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CANG Cango Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 229.36% | 31.85% | 3.57% | 2.73% |
Financials
BTDR vs. CANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares and Cango Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BTDR and CANG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CANG has higher volatility (39.70%) compared to BTDR (31.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTDR dropped -79.52% vs CANG's -91.77%.
BTDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTDR and CANG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer