PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTDR vs. CANG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTDR vs. CANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) and Cango Inc. (CANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTDR achieves a 64.94% return, which is significantly higher than CANG's -78.00% return.


BTDR

1D
5.84%
1M
37.27%
YTD
64.94%
6M
54.08%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
54.13%
5Y*
10Y*

CANG

1D
0.30%
1M
-52.24%
YTD
-78.00%
6M
-72.27%
1Y
-87.31%
3Y*
-18.07%
5Y*
-17.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTDR vs. CANG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BTDR
Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares
64.94%-48.27%119.78%-1.40%
CANG
Cango Inc.
-78.00%-31.82%331.37%-12.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BTDR and CANG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023

0.26

The correlation between BTDR and CANG shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTDR:

$4.32B

CANG:

$118.34M

EPS

BTDR:

-$2.23

CANG:

-$10.61

PS Ratio

BTDR:

5.65

CANG:

0.05

PB Ratio

BTDR:

5.91

CANG:

0.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTDR:

$739.06M

CANG:

$2.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTDR:

$25.18M

CANG:

-$783.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTDR:

$59.65M

CANG:

-$1.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTDR vs. CANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTDR
BTDR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BTDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTDR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BTDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTDR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CANG
CANG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTDR vs. CANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) and Cango Inc. (CANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTDRCANGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.76

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

-0.99

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

-1.64

+2.39

BTDR vs. CANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTDR Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the CANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTDR and CANG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTDRCANGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

-0.86

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.22

+0.39

Drawdowns

BTDR vs. CANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTDR drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum CANG drawdown of -91.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTDR and CANG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTDRCANGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.52%

-91.77%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.89%

-88.04%

+16.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.52%

-91.77%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.16%

-91.75%

+62.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.72%

-59.79%

+16.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.76%

53.31%

-10.55%

Volatility

BTDR vs. CANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) is 31.03%, while Cango Inc. (CANG) has a volatility of 39.70%. This indicates that BTDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTDRCANGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.03%

39.70%

-8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.71%

90.51%

-21.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.30%

102.07%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

122.86%

82.80%

+40.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.86%

83.81%

+39.05%

Dividends

BTDR vs. CANG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTDR nor CANG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BTDR
Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CANG
Cango Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%229.36%31.85%3.57%2.73%

Financials

BTDR vs. CANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares and Cango Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
188.93M
702.01M
(BTDR) Total Revenue
(CANG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BTDR and CANG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CANG has higher volatility (39.70%) compared to BTDR (31.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTDR dropped -79.52% vs CANG's -91.77%.

BTDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTDR and CANG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer