PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCZ vs. SNDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BTCZ

1D
5.28%
1M
46.26%
YTD
32.54%
6M
46.67%
1Y
55.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SNDU

1D
-4.66%
1M
92.79%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTCZ and SNDU is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCZ vs. SNDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCZSNDUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.17

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCZSNDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

1,810.36

-1,810.93

Drawdowns

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than SNDU's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and SNDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCZSNDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.06%

-46.69%

-44.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.63%

-4.66%

-73.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.72%

-10.40%

-63.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.74%

Volatility

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCZSNDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.46%

186.12%

-98.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.12%

186.12%

-89.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.12%

186.12%

-89.00%

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SNDU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCZ vs. SNDU - Dividend Comparison

BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while SNDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
0.01%0.02%0.08%
SNDU
T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCZ and SNDU have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNDU.

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for SNDU.

BTCZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SNDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 1.50% for SNDU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCZ and SNDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer