BTCZ vs. BITC
BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCZ returned 59.01% vs -13.86% for BITC. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
BTCZ vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 40.86% return, which is significantly higher than BITC's 3.58% return.
BTCZ
- 1D
- 6.37%
- 1M
- 40.52%
- YTD
- 40.86%
- 6M
- 41.38%
- 1Y
- 59.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 40.86% | -29.11% | -76.45% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.58% | -20.46% | 55.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCZ and BITC is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024 | -0.68 |
The correlation between BTCZ and BITC shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (all time) to -0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCZ vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
BTCZ
BITC
BTCZ vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCZ | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | -0.52 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | -0.73 | +3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCZ vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCZ | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.06% | -38.51% | -52.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.02% | -26.51% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.28% | -28.82% | -48.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.68% | -16.51% | -57.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.87% | 18.94% | +5.93% |
Volatility
BTCZ vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a higher volatility of 26.49% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 3.42%. This indicates that BTCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCZ | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.49% | 3.42% | +23.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.94% | 19.00% | +49.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.72% | 25.12% | +63.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.08% | 46.29% | +50.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.08% | 46.29% | +50.79% |
BTCZ vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCZ vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BITC's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.25% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCZ and BITC have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (26.49%) compared to BITC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCZ dropped -91.06% vs BITC's -38.51%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 59.01% vs -13.86% for BITC. On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 59.01% return vs -13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 0.88% for BITC.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCZ and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer