PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCZ vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 32.54% return, which is significantly higher than BFOC's -7.17% return.


BTCZ

1D
5.28%
1M
46.26%
YTD
32.54%
6M
46.67%
1Y
55.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-7.17%
6M
-8.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTCZ and BFOC is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

-0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCZ vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCZ
BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BFOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCZBFOCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.17

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCZBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

-1.86

+1.29

Drawdowns

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCZBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.06%

-18.01%

-73.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.63%

-18.01%

-60.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.72%

-12.48%

-61.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.74%

Volatility

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCZBFOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.46%

12.64%

+74.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.12%

12.64%

+84.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.12%

12.64%

+84.48%

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCZ vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BTCZ and BFOC have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.

BTCZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCZ and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer