BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units) and HBIX.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCX-B.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by CI Global Asset Management, while HBIX.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest. Over the past year, BTCX-B.TO returned -38.32% vs -41.89% for HBIX.NEO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTCX-B.TO charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HBIX.NEO.

Performance

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCX-B.TO achieves a -24.79% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -28.85% return.

BTCX-B.TO

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: -16.88%
• YTD: -24.79%
• 6M: -30.42%
• 1Y: -38.32%
• 3Y*: 34.38%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: —

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -19.49%
• YTD: -28.85%
• 6M: -33.69%
• 1Y: -41.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units	-24.79%	-7.99%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-28.85%	-6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025	0.95

The correlation between BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCX-B.TO

BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

HBIX.NEO

HBIX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HBIX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCX-B.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	-0.81	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.24	-1.08	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.87	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.75	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-1.33	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is comparable to the HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCX-B.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	-0.81	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	-0.62	+0.70

Drawdowns

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than HBIX.NEO's maximum drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCX-B.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.26%	-55.90%	-19.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.41%	-55.90%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.50%	-52.88%	+4.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.95%	-23.75%	-9.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.08%	31.57%	-2.49%

Volatility

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) is 9.83%, while Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that BTCX-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBIX.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCX-B.TO	HBIX.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.83%	11.40%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.96%	41.52%	-7.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.89%	51.62%	-8.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.13%	50.94%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.99%	50.94%	+4.05%

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCX-B.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.52%.

Position	TTM	2025
BTCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units	0.00%	0.00%
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	44.52%	20.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BTCX-B.TO or HBIX.NEO?

On fees, HBIX.NEO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCX-B.TO or HBIX.NEO?

HBIX.NEO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

What is the main difference between BTCX-B.TO and HBIX.NEO?

BTCX-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while HBIX.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO and 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.