BTCW vs. OOSP
BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Over the past year, BTCW returned -38.63% vs 6.71% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.
Performance
BTCW vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -25.39% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.41% return.
BTCW
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -18.38%
- YTD
- -25.39%
- 6M
- -29.81%
- 1Y
- -38.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOSP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCW vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | -25.39% | -6.05% | 32.35% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 2.41% | 7.41% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCW and OOSP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCW vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank
BTCW
OOSP
BTCW vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCW | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.38 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 5.13 | -5.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 19.01 | -20.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCW | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 1.82 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 2.29 | -1.98 |
Drawdowns
BTCW vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -49.29%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and OOSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCW | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.29% | -1.31% | -47.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.29% | -1.31% | -47.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.99% | -0.18% | -47.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -0.20% | -15.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.40% | 0.35% | +28.05% |
Volatility
BTCW vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 1.23%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCW | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 1.23% | +8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.25% | 2.23% | +32.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.53% | 3.71% | +39.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.10% | 3.35% | +46.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.10% | 3.35% | +46.75% |
BTCW vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCW vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison
BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 6.47% | 6.71% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCW and OOSP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCW has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to OOSP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -49.29% vs OOSP's -1.31%.
On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.71% vs -38.63% for BTCW. On fees, BTCW is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.71% return vs -38.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTCW is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.
OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.
BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.90% for OOSP.
OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCW and OOSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer