PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCW vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCW vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BTCW having a -27.50% return and BITO slightly lower at -28.52%.


BTCW

1D
2.64%
1M
-21.41%
YTD
-27.50%
6M
-30.91%
1Y
-41.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
2.49%
1M
-21.63%
YTD
-28.52%
6M
-31.94%
1Y
-44.02%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCW vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCW
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund
-27.50%-6.05%92.79%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-28.52%-11.19%87.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and BITO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

1.00

The correlation between BTCW and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCW vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCW
BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCW vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCWBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.83

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.83

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-1.46

+0.04

BTCW vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is comparable to the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -52.10%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCWBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.10%

-77.86%

+25.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.10%

-53.10%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.47%

-50.70%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-36.78%

+20.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.44%

30.15%

-0.71%

Volatility

BTCW vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) have volatilities of 12.02% and 11.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCWBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

11.67%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.29%

34.20%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.91%

43.88%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.18%

55.09%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.18%

55.09%

-4.91%

BTCW vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCW vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
69.67%78.29%61.59%15.14%
BTCW
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, BTCW and BITO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTCW has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to BITO (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -52.10% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 1-year performance, BTCW leads with -41.75% vs -44.02% for BITO. On fees, BTCW is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCW has performed better with a -41.75% return vs -44.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCW is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 69.67%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.95% for BITO.

BTCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCW and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer