BTCT vs. FSPGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).

FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BTCT BTC Digital Ltd.	-6.92%	-72.80%	-0.83%	37.40%	-97.67%	-87.48%	-91.45%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	-9.77%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	61.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCT achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -9.77% return.

BTCT

• 1D: 8.04%
• 1M: -3.97%
• YTD: -6.92%
• 6M: -57.24%
• 1Y: -69.29%
• 3Y*: -34.82%
• 5Y*: -75.68%
• 10Y*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -9.26%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 21.16%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BTCT vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCT

BTCT Risk / Return Rank: 7
BTCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BTCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BTCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BTCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BTCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCT	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	0.84	-1.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.56	1.36	-2.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.19	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	1.17	-2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	4.02	-5.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCT and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCT	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.86	0.84	-1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.41	0.58	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.45	0.80	-1.25

Correlation

The correlation between BTCT and FSPGX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

BTCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BTCT BTC Digital Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.38%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Drawdowns

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCT and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCT	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-32.66%	-67.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.71%	-16.17%	-58.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.93%	-32.66%	-67.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-13.03%	-86.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-94.71%	-6.43%	-88.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.76%	4.70%	+42.06%

Volatility

BTCT vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 6.71%. This indicates that BTCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCT	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.03%	6.71%	+10.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.07%	12.37%	+43.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.38%	22.58%	+57.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	187.19%	21.52%	+165.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	176.40%	21.66%	+154.74%