BTCO vs. YBTC
BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTCO is passively managed, while YBTC is actively managed. Over the past year, BTCO returned -38.71% vs -35.71% for YBTC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YBTC.
Performance
BTCO vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -25.40% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.39% return.
BTCO
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -25.40%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -16.32%
- YTD
- -23.39%
- 6M
- -26.70%
- 1Y
- -35.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCO vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | -25.40% | -6.58% | 128.42% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.39% | -4.23% | 58.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCO and YBTC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between BTCO and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCO vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
BTCO
YBTC
BTCO vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.85 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.76 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.39 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | -0.91 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.16 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
BTCO vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -47.09% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | -47.09% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.03% | -44.06% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -12.89% | -3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | 25.69% | +2.72% |
Volatility
BTCO vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 8.85%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCO | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 8.85% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 31.81% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.56% | 39.20% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 40.81% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 40.81% | +8.96% |
BTCO vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCO vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 88.13% | 76.04% | 44.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BTCO and YBTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BTCO has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -49.33% vs YBTC's -47.09%.
On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -35.71% vs -38.71% for BTCO. On fees, BTCO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -35.71% return vs -38.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTCO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BTCO and 0.95% for YBTC.
BTCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCO and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer