PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCO vs. YBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCO vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -25.40% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.39% return.


BTCO

1D
-2.74%
1M
-18.43%
YTD
-25.40%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YBTC

1D
-2.77%
1M
-16.32%
YTD
-23.39%
6M
-26.70%
1Y
-35.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCO vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
-25.40%-6.58%128.42%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-23.39%-4.23%58.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCO and YBTC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024

0.88

The correlation between BTCO and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCO vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCO
BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCO vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCOYBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.76

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-1.39

+0.03

BTCO vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCO and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCOYBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.91

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.16

+0.14

Drawdowns

BTCO vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and YBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCOYBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-47.09%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

-47.09%

-2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.03%

-44.06%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-12.89%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.41%

25.69%

+2.72%

Volatility

BTCO vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 8.85%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCOYBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

8.85%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.37%

31.81%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.56%

39.20%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.77%

40.81%

+8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.77%

40.81%

+8.96%

BTCO vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCO vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.13%.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
88.13%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BTCO and YBTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTCO has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -49.33% vs YBTC's -47.09%.

On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -35.71% vs -38.71% for BTCO. On fees, BTCO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -35.71% return vs -38.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BTCO and 0.95% for YBTC.

BTCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCO and YBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer