BTCL vs. SOFR
BTCL (T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCL is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX, while SOFR is a Multisector Bonds fund tracking the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. BTCL is actively managed, while SOFR is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCL returned -74.96% vs 3.92% for SOFR. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BTCL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.
Performance
BTCL vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCL achieves a -55.71% return, which is significantly lower than SOFR's 1.46% return.
BTCL
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- -40.66%
- YTD
- -55.71%
- 6M
- -61.59%
- 1Y
- -74.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCL vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | -55.71% | -39.52% | 84.39% |
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 1.46% | 4.27% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCL and SOFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCL vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank
BTCL
SOFR
BTCL vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCL | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 3.37 | -2.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 9.68 | -10.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 39.82 | -41.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCL | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | 4.68 | -5.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 4.96 | -5.23 |
Drawdowns
BTCL vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCL drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCL and SOFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCL | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -0.41% | -80.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.75% | -0.41% | -80.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.75% | -0.14% | -80.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -0.03% | -34.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.74% | 0.10% | +50.64% |
Volatility
BTCL vs. SOFR - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) at 0.24%. This indicates that BTCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCL | SOFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.49% | 0.24% | +18.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.72% | 0.55% | +68.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.41% | 0.84% | +86.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.85% | 0.84% | +97.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.85% | 0.84% | +97.01% |
BTCL vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCL vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison
BTCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than SOFR's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 3.83% | 1.70% | 4.35% |
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 3.95% | 4.22% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCL and SOFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCL has higher volatility (18.49%) compared to SOFR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCL dropped -80.75% vs SOFR's -0.41%.
On 1-year performance, SOFR leads with 3.92% vs -74.96% for BTCL. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SOFR has performed better with a 3.92% return vs -74.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCL.
SOFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.83% for BTCL.
BTCL is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCL and 0.20% for SOFR.
SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCL and SOFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer