BTCL vs. OOSP
BTCL (T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCL is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCL returned -74.22% vs 6.71% for OOSP. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BTCL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.
Performance
BTCL vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCL achieves a -53.22% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.41% return.
BTCL
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -35.14%
- YTD
- -53.22%
- 6M
- -59.97%
- 1Y
- -74.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOSP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCL vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | -53.22% | -39.52% | 105.78% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 2.41% | 7.41% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCL and OOSP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCL vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank
BTCL
OOSP
BTCL vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCL | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.38 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 5.13 | -6.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 19.01 | -20.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCL | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 1.82 | -2.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 2.29 | -2.54 |
Drawdowns
BTCL vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCL drawdown since its inception was -79.66%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCL and OOSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCL | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.66% | -1.31% | -78.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.66% | -1.31% | -78.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.66% | -0.18% | -79.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.15% | -0.20% | -33.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.49% | 0.35% | +50.14% |
Volatility
BTCL vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) has a higher volatility of 19.12% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 1.23%. This indicates that BTCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCL | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.12% | 1.23% | +17.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.76% | 2.23% | +67.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.35% | 3.71% | +83.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.87% | 3.35% | +94.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.87% | 3.35% | +94.52% |
BTCL vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCL vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison
BTCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than OOSP's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 3.62% | 1.70% | 4.35% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 6.47% | 6.71% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCL and OOSP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCL has higher volatility (19.12%) compared to OOSP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCL dropped -79.66% vs OOSP's -1.31%.
On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.71% vs -74.22% for BTCL. On fees, OOSP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.71% return vs -74.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OOSP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCL.
OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 3.62% for BTCL.
BTCL is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCL and 0.90% for OOSP.
OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCL and OOSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer