BTCL vs. DRNZ
BTCL (T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCL is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX, while DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index. BTCL is actively managed, while DRNZ is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCL achieves a -55.71% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 27.64% return.
BTCL
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- -40.66%
- YTD
- -55.71%
- 6M
- -61.59%
- 1Y
- -74.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 27.64%
- 6M
- 32.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | -55.71% | -42.36% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 27.64% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCL and DRNZ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCL vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
BTCL
DRNZ
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCL | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCL | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 0.48 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCL drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCL and DRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCL | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.75% | -24.52% | -56.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.75% | -5.32% | -75.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -11.08% | -23.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.74% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCL | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.41% | 50.73% | +36.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.85% | 50.73% | +47.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.85% | 50.73% | +47.12% |
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCL vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
BTCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, while DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 3.83% | 1.70% | 4.35% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCL and DRNZ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCL.
BTCL has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
BTCL is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCL and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for BTCL and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer