PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while ZCSH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZCSH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 20.83% return.


BTCE.DE

1D
-3.79%
1M
-21.28%
YTD
-27.02%
6M
-31.67%
1Y
-41.65%
3Y*
28.04%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-15.58%
1M
13.17%
YTD
20.83%
6M
43.74%
1Y
839.68%
3Y*
164.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
-27.02%-18.20%125.79%146.52%-63.89%-21.60%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
20.83%381.90%109.92%60.93%-85.45%-47.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCE.DE and ZCSH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCE.DE
BTCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCE.DEZCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.46

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

12.08

-12.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

23.45

-24.91

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the ZCSH Sharpe Ratio of 5.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCE.DE and ZCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCE.DEZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

5.09

-6.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.07

+0.52

Drawdowns

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCE.DEZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.62%

-93.09%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.76%

-70.21%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.76%

-71.67%

+21.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.27%

-28.67%

-20.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-73.34%

+43.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.52%

36.09%

-7.57%

Volatility

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) is 9.82%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 50.53%. This indicates that BTCE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCE.DEZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

50.53%

-40.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.25%

94.61%

-63.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

166.62%

-126.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.58%

136.76%

-84.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.85%

136.76%

-78.91%

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCE.DE vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCE.DE nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCE.DE and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTCE.DE is cheaper at 2.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTCE.DE is cheaper with a 2.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer