PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while BFOC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BFOC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -6.33% return.


BTCE.DE

1D
-3.79%
1M
-21.28%
YTD
-27.02%
6M
-31.67%
1Y
-41.65%
3Y*
28.04%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-6.33%
6M
-8.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
-27.02%-25.85%
BFOC
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October
-6.33%-9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCE.DE and BFOC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCE.DE
BTCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BFOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCE.DEBFOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCE.DEBFOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-1.67

+2.25

Drawdowns

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCE.DEBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.62%

-18.52%

-56.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.27%

-17.69%

-31.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-12.45%

-17.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.52%

Volatility

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCE.DEBFOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

13.40%

+26.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.58%

13.40%

+39.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.85%

13.40%

+44.45%

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCE.DE nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCE.DE and BFOC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.

BTCE.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer