BTCE.DE vs. BFOC
BTCE.DE (ETC Group Physical Bitcoin) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCE.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ETC Issuance, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCE.DE charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while BFOC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BFOC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -6.33% return.
BTCE.DE
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -21.28%
- YTD
- -27.02%
- 6M
- -31.67%
- 1Y
- -41.65%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -8.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | -27.02% | -25.85% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -6.33% | -9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCE.DE and BFOC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
BTCE.DE
BFOC
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCE.DE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCE.DE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | -1.67 | +2.25 |
Drawdowns
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCE.DE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -18.52% | -56.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.27% | -17.69% | -31.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -12.45% | -17.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.52% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCE.DE | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.81% | 13.40% | +26.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.58% | 13.40% | +39.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.85% | 13.40% | +44.45% |
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCE.DE vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCE.DE nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCE.DE and BFOC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
BTCE.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer