BTCC vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTCC is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCC returned -33.54% vs 73.27% for IBLC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCC charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

BTCC vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.

BTCC

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -15.87%
• YTD: -20.81%
• 6M: -22.94%
• 1Y: -33.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-20.81%	-6.34%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	63.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC and IBLC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.67

The correlation between BTCC and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCC vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC

BTCC Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BTCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCC	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.02	1.34	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	1.92	-3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.23	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	1.64	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	3.26	-4.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCC vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC and IBLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCC	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.02	1.34	-2.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.72	0.40	-1.11

Drawdowns

BTCC vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCC	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	-62.54%	+18.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.40%	-44.94%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.44%	-12.99%	-26.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.57%	-25.89%	+10.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.87%	22.56%	+0.31%

Volatility

BTCC vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) is 8.70%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that BTCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCC	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.70%	14.67%	-5.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.70%	40.76%	-13.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	54.94%	-22.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.68%	64.49%	-32.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.68%	64.49%	-32.81%

BTCC vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCC vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, more than IBLC's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	105.03%	63.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCC and IBLC in my portfolio?

BTCC and IBLC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCC or IBLC?

IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to BTCC (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCC dropped -44.40% vs IBLC's -62.54%.

Which ETF is better, BTCC or IBLC?

On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 73.27% vs -33.54% for BTCC. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BTCC has been the lower-risk option at 8.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCC or IBLC?

Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 73.27% return vs -33.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCC or IBLC?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BTCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCC or IBLC?

BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 4.77% for IBLC.

What is the main difference between BTCC and IBLC?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.47% for IBLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.