BTCC vs. GSOL
BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCC charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.
Performance
BTCC vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTCC
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -15.48%
- YTD
- -22.58%
- 6M
- -22.28%
- 1Y
- -35.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -14.33% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -14.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC and GSOL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC vs. GSOL — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC
GSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTCC vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCC | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCC vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and GSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -22.60% | -21.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.78% | -15.93% | -24.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -12.89% | -3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.66% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCC vs. GSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC | GSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.95% | 83.47% | -49.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.08% | 83.47% | -51.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.08% | 83.47% | -51.39% |
BTCC vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCC vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison
BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 111.84%, while GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 111.84% | 63.86% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC and GSOL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BTCC.
BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 111.84%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.
Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.35% for GSOL.
Find the right allocation for BTCC and GSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer