BTCC vs. GSOL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTCC charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSOL.

Performance

BTCC vs. GSOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BTCC

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -15.87%
• YTD: -20.81%
• 6M: -22.94%
• 1Y: -33.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSOL

• 1D: -4.43%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC vs. GSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-10.24%
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF	-12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC and GSOL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

BTCC vs. GSOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC

BTCC Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BTCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC vs. GSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCC	GSOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCC	GSOL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.72	-2.23	+1.52

Drawdowns

BTCC vs. GSOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than GSOL's maximum drawdown of -12.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and GSOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCC	GSOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	-12.36%	-32.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.44%	-12.36%	-27.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.57%	-5.53%	-10.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTCC	GSOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.92%	51.66%	-18.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.68%	51.66%	-19.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.68%	51.66%	-19.98%

BTCC vs. GSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GSOL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCC vs. GSOL - Dividend Comparison

BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, while GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	105.03%	63.86%
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCC and GSOL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, BTCC and GSOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BTCC or GSOL?

On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCC or GSOL?

GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BTCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCC or GSOL?

BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.

What is the main difference between BTCC and GSOL?

Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.35% for GSOL.