BTCC vs. CSHP
BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCC returned -33.54% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BTCC charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
BTCC vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.
BTCC
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -15.87%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -22.94%
- 1Y
- -33.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -20.81% | -6.34% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.63% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC and CSHP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC
CSHP
BTCC vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -32.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 7.44 | -6.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 65.71 | -66.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 432.16 | -433.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 11.91 | -12.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | 10.75 | -11.47 |
Drawdowns
BTCC vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -0.08% | -44.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.40% | -0.06% | -44.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.44% | 0.00% | -39.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -0.00% | -15.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.87% | 0.01% | +22.86% |
Volatility
BTCC vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that BTCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 0.07% | +8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | 0.24% | +27.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.92% | 0.33% | +32.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 0.40% | +31.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 0.40% | +31.28% |
BTCC vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCC vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 105.03% | 63.86% | 0.00% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC and CSHP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCC has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCC dropped -44.40% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -33.54% for BTCC. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -33.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BTCC.
BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.
BTCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCC and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer