BTCC vs. CBXO
BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCC charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
BTCC vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.67% return.
BTCC
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -15.87%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -22.94%
- 1Y
- -33.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -20.81% | -20.99% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.67% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC and CBXO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC
CBXO
BTCC vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -2.36 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
BTCC vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -11.40% | -33.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.44% | -11.40% | -28.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -8.46% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.87% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCC vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.92% | 7.23% | +25.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 7.23% | +24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 7.23% | +24.45% |
BTCC vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCC vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 105.03% | 63.86% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC and CBXO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCC is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCC is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.
BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
BTCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for BTCC and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer