BTCC vs. BLOX
BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCC charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
BTCC vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's 16.52% return.
BTCC
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -15.87%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -22.94%
- 1Y
- -33.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -20.81% | -16.71% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 16.52% | 9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC and BLOX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC
BLOX
BTCC vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | 0.54 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
BTCC vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -47.09% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.44% | -19.45% | -19.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -18.53% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.87% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCC vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.92% | 53.44% | -20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 53.44% | -21.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 53.44% | -21.76% |
BTCC vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCC vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, more than BLOX's 36.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 36.81% | 22.69% |
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 105.03% | 63.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC and BLOX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCC is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCC is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.
BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 36.81% for BLOX.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 1.03% for BLOX.
Find the right allocation for BTCC and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer