PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's 6.98% return.


BTCC

1D
-2.53%
1M
-15.87%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-22.94%
1Y
-33.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.00%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
6.98%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
-15.09%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTCC and BITC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.52

The correlation between BTCC and BITC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC
BTCC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCCBITCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.90

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.57

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

-0.82

-0.64

BTCC vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC and BITC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCCBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

-0.59

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

0.68

-1.39

Drawdowns

BTCC vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCCBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-38.51%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.40%

-26.51%

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.44%

-26.48%

-12.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-16.37%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.87%

18.37%

+4.50%

Volatility

BTCC vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 6.39%. This indicates that BTCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCCBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

6.39%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.70%

19.98%

+7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.92%

25.54%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

46.65%

-14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.68%

46.65%

-14.97%

BTCC vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCC vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.03%, more than BITC's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.14%3.36%42.68%5.82%
BTCC
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
105.03%63.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC and BITC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCC has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to BITC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCC dropped -44.40% vs BITC's -38.51%.

On 1-year performance, BITC leads with -15.09% vs -33.54% for BTCC. On fees, BTCC is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITC has performed better with a -15.09% return vs -33.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTCC is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.

BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 105.03%, compared with 3.14% for BITC.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BTCC and 0.88% for BITC.

BITC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer