PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC.TO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTCC.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -29.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 38.36% return.


BTCC.TO

1D
0.18%
1M
-19.17%
YTD
-29.50%
6M
-29.77%
1Y
-41.35%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*

SPMO

1D
3.60%
1M
13.34%
YTD
38.36%
6M
37.63%
1Y
55.34%
3Y*
46.89%
5Y*
27.83%
10Y*
22.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
-29.50%-9.18%116.50%149.22%-65.78%-13.94%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
38.36%20.80%58.16%14.76%-4.78%23.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC.TO and SPMO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC.TO
BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCC.TOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.49

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

4.27

-5.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

14.27

-15.62

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC.TO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -26.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCC.TOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.80%

-26.80%

-51.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.17%

-12.95%

-40.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.17%

-21.35%

-31.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.80%

-21.43%

-56.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.19%

0.00%

-51.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-4.16%

-30.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.10%

3.87%

+27.23%

Volatility

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.75%. This indicates that BTCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCC.TOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.02%

10.75%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.15%

17.49%

+16.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.76%

20.26%

+23.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.12%

20.64%

+34.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.36%

21.63%

+34.73%

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCC.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.63%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC.TO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTCC.TO.

BTCC.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTCC.TO and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer