BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCC.TO (Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units) and SBT.TO (Purpose Silver Bullion Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCC.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while SBT.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. BTCC.TO is actively managed, while SBT.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTCC.TO returned 8.41%/yr vs 18.84%/yr for SBT.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCC.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SBT.TO.

Performance

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -26.80% return, which is significantly lower than SBT.TO's 2.24% return.

BTCC.TO

• 1D: -2.83%
• 1M: -18.68%
• YTD: -26.80%
• 6M: -31.17%
• 1Y: -40.83%
• 3Y*: 29.76%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: —

SBT.TO

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 24.07%
• 1Y: 105.34%
• 3Y*: 42.09%
• 5Y*: 18.84%
• 10Y*: 13.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units	-26.80%	-9.18%	116.50%	149.22%	-65.78%	-7.04%
SBT.TO Purpose Silver Bullion Fund	2.24%	137.07%	18.55%	-0.86%	1.99%	-15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC.TO and SBT.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021	0.11

The correlation between BTCC.TO and SBT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC.TO

BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SBT.TO

SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 46
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCC.TO	SBT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	1.80	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.35	2.02	-3.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.34	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	2.48	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	5.33	-6.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC.TO and SBT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCC.TO	SBT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.95	1.80	-2.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.52	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.21	-0.16

Drawdowns

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than SBT.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and SBT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCC.TO	SBT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.80%	-47.82%	-29.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.04%	-42.69%	-7.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.04%	-42.69%	-7.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.80%	-42.69%	-35.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.32%	-37.47%	-11.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.63%	-16.92%	-17.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.07%	19.84%	+9.23%

Volatility

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) is 9.89%, while Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a volatility of 17.19%. This indicates that BTCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCC.TO	SBT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.89%	17.19%	-7.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.00%	57.92%	-23.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.32%	59.01%	-15.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.47%	36.64%	+18.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.81%	66.58%	-9.77%

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SBT.TO's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCC.TO vs. SBT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCC.TO nor SBT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCC.TO and SBT.TO in my portfolio?

BTCC.TO and SBT.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTCC.TO or SBT.TO?

On fees, SBT.TO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCC.TO or SBT.TO?

SBT.TO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTCC.TO.

What is the main difference between BTCC.TO and SBT.TO?

BTCC.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SBT.TO is Silver. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTCC.TO and 0.36% for SBT.TO.