BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO
BTCC.TO (Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units) and CCCX-B.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCC.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX-B.TO.
Performance
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -26.80% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX-B.TO's -28.96% return.
BTCC.TO
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -26.80%
- 6M
- -31.17%
- 1Y
- -40.83%
- 3Y*
- 29.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- —
CCCX-B.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -16.58%
- YTD
- -28.96%
- 6M
- -33.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units | -26.80% | -22.66% |
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) | -28.96% | -27.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC.TO and CCCX-B.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC.TO
CCCX-B.TO
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -1.24 | +1.28 |
Drawdowns
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than CCCX-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and CCCX-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.80% | -54.49% | -23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.32% | -53.93% | +4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -33.05% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC.TO | CCCX-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.32% | 47.23% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.47% | 47.23% | +8.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.81% | 47.23% | +9.58% |
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX-B.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCC.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCC.TO nor CCCX-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC.TO and CCCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCCX-B.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCCX-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTCC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and CI Global Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTCC.TO and 0.50% for CCCX-B.TO.
Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and CCCX-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer