BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO
BTCC.TO (Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units) is Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while BNT.TO (Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BTCC.TO returned 29.76%/yr vs 13.86%/yr for BNT.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -26.80% return, which is significantly lower than BNT.TO's -3.53% return.
BTCC.TO
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -26.80%
- 6M
- -31.17%
- 1Y
- -40.83%
- 3Y*
- 29.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- —
BNT.TO
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- -23.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units | -26.80% | -9.18% | 116.50% | 149.22% | -65.78% | 31.19% |
BNT.TO Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd | -3.53% | -23.11% | 57.07% | 26.27% | -40.95% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC.TO and BNT.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC.TO
BNT.TO
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd (BNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC.TO | BNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.93 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.52 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -0.77 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC.TO | BNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | -0.51 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -0.01 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than BNT.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and BNT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC.TO | BNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.80% | -45.87% | -31.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.04% | -44.74% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.04% | -44.74% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.32% | -39.45% | -9.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -21.61% | -13.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | 30.47% | -1.40% |
Volatility
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd (BNT.TO) have volatilities of 9.89% and 9.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC.TO | BNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 9.50% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.00% | 21.27% | +12.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.32% | 45.80% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.47% | 34.56% | +20.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.81% | 34.56% | +22.25% |
Dividends
BTCC.TO vs. BNT.TO - Dividend Comparison
BTCC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNT.TO Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.53% | 0.72% | 13.81% | 0.42% |
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC.TO and BNT.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and BNT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer