BNT.TO vs. BN.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd (BNT.TO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO).

Performance

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd (BNT.TO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNT.TO Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd	-8.46%	-23.11%	57.07%	26.27%	-40.95%	12.69%
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation	-10.39%	15.10%	56.51%	26.33%	-29.85%	19.78%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) BNT.TO : CA$9.40B BN.TO : CA$76.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) BNT.TO : CA$9.38B BN.TO : CA$23.88B
EBITDA (TTM) BNT.TO : CA$1.59B BN.TO : CA$32.85B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNT.TO achieves a -8.46% return, which is significantly higher than BN.TO's -10.39% return.

BNT.TO

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: -8.46%
• 6M: -39.29%
• 1Y: -22.75%
• 3Y*: 10.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BN.TO

• 1D: 4.45%
• 1M: -5.60%
• YTD: -10.39%
• 6M: -11.18%
• 1Y: 12.95%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 14.61%
• 10Y*: 15.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNT.TO

BNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 23
BNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BN.TO

BN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
BN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd (BNT.TO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNT.TO	BN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	0.39	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	0.75	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.10	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	0.65	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	1.91	-2.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the BN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNT.TO and BN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNT.TO	BN.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46	0.39	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.43	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between BNT.TO and BN.TO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than BN.TO's 0.61% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNT.TO Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd	0.74%	0.73%	0.53%	0.72%	13.81%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation	0.61%	0.53%	0.53%	0.99%	2.06%	1.06%	1.52%	1.41%	1.88%	1.64%	1.58%	1.43%

Drawdowns

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.87%, smaller than the maximum BN.TO drawdown of -83.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNT.TO and BN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNT.TO	BN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.87%	-83.06%	+37.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.74%	-22.47%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.54%	-16.83%	-25.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.00%	-20.73%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.16%	7.67%	+18.49%

Volatility

BNT.TO vs. BN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd (BNT.TO) is 9.13%, while Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that BNT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNT.TO	BN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.13%	9.93%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.75%	21.46%	+28.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.28%	33.48%	+15.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.72%	28.61%	+6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.72%	28.09%	+6.63%

Financials