BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCC-B.TO (Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units) and YCST.NEO (Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCC-B.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while YCST.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCC-B.TO returned -38.41% vs -7.85% for YCST.NEO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCC-B.TO charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for YCST.NEO.

Performance

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC-B.TO achieves a -24.57% return, which is significantly lower than YCST.NEO's 12.72% return.

BTCC-B.TO

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: -16.56%
• YTD: -24.57%
• 6M: -30.34%
• 1Y: -38.41%
• 3Y*: 33.56%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: —

YCST.NEO

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -5.63%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 5.30%
• 1Y: -7.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units	-24.57%	-15.00%
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	12.72%	-16.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and YCST.NEO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC-B.TO

BTCC-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCC-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

YCST.NEO

YCST.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 5
YCST.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
YCST.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YCST.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YCST.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
YCST.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCC-B.TO	YCST.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	-0.38	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	-0.41	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.95	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.40	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-0.81	-0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the YCST.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC-B.TO and YCST.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCC-B.TO	YCST.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	-0.38	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	-0.18	+0.26

Drawdowns

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, which is greater than YCST.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC-B.TO and YCST.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCC-B.TO	YCST.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.12%	-19.70%	-55.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.47%	-19.54%	-30.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.47%	-12.62%	-35.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.80%	-8.56%	-24.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.15%	9.91%	+19.24%

Volatility

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) is 9.66%, while Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YCST.NEO) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that BTCC-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCST.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCC-B.TO	YCST.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.66%	10.33%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.59%	16.64%	+16.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.49%	20.54%	+21.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.77%	25.22%	+28.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.95%	25.22%	+29.73%

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than YCST.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCC-B.TO vs. YCST.NEO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YCST.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%.

Position	TTM	2025
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units	0.00%	0.00%
YCST.NEO Costco (COST) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	14.01%	10.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCC-B.TO and YCST.NEO in my portfolio?

BTCC-B.TO and YCST.NEO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTCC-B.TO or YCST.NEO?

On fees, YCST.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCC-B.TO or YCST.NEO?

YCST.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.

What is the main difference between BTCC-B.TO and YCST.NEO?

BTCC-B.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while YCST.NEO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO and 0.40% for YCST.NEO.