BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO
BTCC-B.TO (Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units) and XRPP.TO (Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCC-B.TO charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for XRPP.TO.
Performance
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCC-B.TO achieves a -24.57% return, which is significantly higher than XRPP.TO's -34.43% return.
BTCC-B.TO
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- -24.57%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -38.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
XRPP.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -12.92%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -45.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units | -24.57% | -16.15% |
XRPP.TO Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units | -34.43% | -15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and XRPP.TO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCC-B.TO
XRPP.TO
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose XRP ETF CAD Currency Hedged Units (XRPP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCC-B.TO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCC-B.TO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.62 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, which is greater than XRPP.TO's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC-B.TO and XRPP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCC-B.TO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.12% | -66.98% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.47% | -66.67% | +18.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.80% | -38.53% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.15% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCC-B.TO | XRPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.49% | 74.60% | -32.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.77% | 74.60% | -20.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.95% | 74.60% | -19.65% |
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCC-B.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPP.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCC-B.TO vs. XRPP.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTCC-B.TO nor XRPP.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCC-B.TO and XRPP.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPP.TO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPP.TO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.
Their fees differ too: 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO and 1.00% for XRPP.TO.
Find the right allocation for BTCC-B.TO and XRPP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer