PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC-B.TO achieves a -24.57% return, which is significantly higher than SOLL.TO's -42.41% return.


BTCC-B.TO

1D
-2.32%
1M
-16.56%
YTD
-24.57%
6M
-30.34%
1Y
-38.41%
3Y*
33.56%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*

SOLL.TO

1D
-4.68%
1M
-14.73%
YTD
-42.41%
6M
-50.32%
1Y
-56.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and SOLL.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025

0.85

The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and SOLL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC-B.TO
BTCC-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SOLL.TO
SOLL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCC-B.TOSOLL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.88

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.79

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-1.24

-0.07

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC-B.TO and SOLL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCC-B.TOSOLL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

-0.78

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.61

+0.69

Drawdowns

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, which is greater than SOLL.TO's maximum drawdown of -71.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC-B.TO and SOLL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCC-B.TOSOLL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.12%

-71.52%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.47%

-71.52%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.47%

-71.52%

+23.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-34.60%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.15%

45.19%

-16.04%

Volatility

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) is 9.66%, while Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that BTCC-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCC-B.TOSOLL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

16.48%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.59%

50.24%

-16.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.49%

72.62%

-30.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.77%

71.16%

-17.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.95%

71.16%

-16.21%

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SOLL.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCC-B.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCC-B.TO nor SOLL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC-B.TO and SOLL.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOLL.TO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOLL.TO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.

Their fees differ too: 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO and 1.00% for SOLL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC-B.TO and SOLL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer