PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTC vs. SOEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTC vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTC achieves a -31.66% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -45.57% return.


BTC

1D
-3.96%
1M
-21.06%
YTD
-31.66%
6M
-31.44%
1Y
-43.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOEZ

1D
-4.36%
1M
-21.72%
YTD
-45.57%
6M
-44.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTC vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
-31.66%-3.92%
SOEZ
Franklin Solana ETF
-45.57%-11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BTC and SOEZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTC vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTC vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCSOEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

BTC vs. SOEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTC vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTC drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTC and SOEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCSOEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.37%

-56.14%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.37%

-54.26%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-32.76%

+15.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.70%

Volatility

BTC vs. SOEZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCSOEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.39%

70.78%

-26.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.29%

70.78%

-22.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.29%

70.78%

-22.49%

BTC vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTC vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BTC and SOEZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOEZ.

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BTC and 0.19% for SOEZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTC and SOEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer