PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTAL vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTAL vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -16.82% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 72.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BTAL has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of -4.23%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 50.09% annualized return.


BTAL

1D
4.00%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
-16.82%
6M
-15.72%
1Y
-33.92%
3Y*
-11.25%
5Y*
-3.89%
10Y*
-4.23%

TECL

1D
-19.93%
1M
4.92%
YTD
72.61%
6M
62.00%
1Y
174.82%
3Y*
66.22%
5Y*
35.93%
10Y*
50.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTAL vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-16.82%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-13.86%1.07%15.13%-2.13%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
72.61%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BTAL and TECL is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011

-0.47

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BTAL and TECL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.47 to -0.75, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

BTAL vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BTAL
TECL

Technology

19.5%
20.6%

Financial Services

14.9%

-

Industrials

13.7%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%

-

Healthcare

10.2%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Utilities

5.2%

-

Energy

4.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Technology

BTAL
19.5%
TECL
20.6%

Financial Services

BTAL
14.9%
TECL

-

Industrials

BTAL
13.7%
TECL
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BTAL
12.8%
TECL

-

Healthcare

BTAL
10.2%
TECL

-

Real Estate

BTAL
6.2%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

BTAL
5.6%
TECL

-

Utilities

BTAL
5.2%
TECL

-

Energy

BTAL
4.4%
TECL
0.0%

Basic Materials

BTAL
4.0%
TECL

-

Communication Services

BTAL
3.4%
TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTAL vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTAL vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTALTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.38

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

3.95

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.60

11.27

-12.87

BTAL vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.59, which is lower than the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTAL and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTALTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.59

2.80

-4.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.48

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

0.69

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.73

-0.95

Drawdowns

BTAL vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTALTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.28%

-77.96%

+27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.50%

-46.58%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.16%

-66.58%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.16%

-77.96%

+32.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.28%

-77.96%

+27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.15%

-25.87%

-22.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.97%

-18.38%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.78%

16.27%

+5.51%

Volatility

BTAL vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) is 7.98%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 31.75%. This indicates that BTAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTALTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

31.75%

-23.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.83%

55.01%

-39.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

65.56%

-43.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

74.60%

-55.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

72.63%

-55.36%

BTAL vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTAL vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than TECL's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
2.99%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
4.12%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTAL and TECL have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (31.75%) compared to BTAL (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 50.09% vs -4.23% for BTAL. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, BTAL has been the lower-risk option at 7.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 50.09% return vs -4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.99% for BTAL.

BTAL is categorized as Long-Short, while TECL is Leveraged Equities. BTAL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index, while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: AGF and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 0.91% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTAL and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer