PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTAL vs. EVNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTAL vs. EVNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and AltShares Event-Driven ETF (EVNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -19.67% return, which is significantly lower than EVNT's 2.77% return.


BTAL

1D
0.70%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-19.67%
6M
-18.88%
1Y
-37.06%
3Y*
-12.64%
5Y*
-4.56%
10Y*
-4.73%

EVNT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.04%
YTD
2.77%
6M
3.20%
1Y
10.74%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTAL vs. EVNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-19.67%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%3.43%
EVNT
AltShares Event-Driven ETF
2.77%13.72%5.13%13.28%-8.62%-3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BTAL and EVNT is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021

-0.54

The correlation between BTAL and EVNT shifts across timeframes, from -0.54 (all time) to -0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BTAL vs. EVNT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BTAL
EVNT

Technology

19.5%
29.2%

Financial Services

14.9%
18.3%

Industrials

13.7%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
1.0%

Healthcare

10.2%
14.8%

Real Estate

6.2%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
2.1%

Utilities

5.2%
4.0%

Energy

4.4%
3.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
4.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
2.7%

Technology

BTAL
19.5%
EVNT
29.2%

Financial Services

BTAL
14.9%
EVNT
18.3%

Industrials

BTAL
13.7%
EVNT
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BTAL
12.8%
EVNT
1.0%

Healthcare

BTAL
10.2%
EVNT
14.8%

Real Estate

BTAL
6.2%
EVNT
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

BTAL
5.6%
EVNT
2.1%

Utilities

BTAL
5.2%
EVNT
4.0%

Energy

BTAL
4.4%
EVNT
3.1%

Basic Materials

BTAL
4.0%
EVNT
4.0%

Communication Services

BTAL
3.4%
EVNT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTAL vs. EVNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

EVNT
EVNT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EVNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVNT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EVNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVNT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTAL vs. EVNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and AltShares Event-Driven ETF (EVNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTALEVNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.72

1.30

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.22

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.72

10.31

-12.03

BTAL vs. EVNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.72, which is lower than the EVNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTAL and EVNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTALEVNTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.72

1.41

-3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.49

-0.73

Drawdowns

BTAL vs. EVNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than EVNT's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and EVNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTALEVNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.28%

-13.85%

-36.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.50%

-3.35%

-34.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.16%

-5.15%

-40.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.93%

-1.13%

-48.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-3.80%

-18.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.54%

1.04%

+20.50%

Volatility

BTAL vs. EVNT - Volatility Comparison

AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to AltShares Event-Driven ETF (EVNT) at 1.20%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTALEVNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

1.20%

+6.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

3.66%

+11.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.59%

7.64%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.75%

9.26%

+9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

9.26%

+7.97%

BTAL vs. EVNT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than EVNT's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTAL vs. EVNT - Dividend Comparison

BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than EVNT's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.10%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%
EVNT
AltShares Event-Driven ETF
4.65%4.78%0.66%0.59%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTAL and EVNT have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTAL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to EVNT (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs EVNT's -13.85%.

On 3-year performance, EVNT leads with 10.05% vs -12.64% for BTAL. On fees, EVNT is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, EVNT has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EVNT has performed better with a 10.05% return vs -12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVNT is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

EVNT has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 3.10% for BTAL.

BTAL is categorized as Long-Short, while EVNT is Event Driven. They also come from different issuers: AGF and AltShares. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 1.30% for EVNT.

EVNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTAL and EVNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer