BSX vs. IBTJ
BSX (Boston Scientific Corporation) is a stock, while IBTJ (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 5 years, BSX returned 1.80%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for IBTJ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BSX vs. IBTJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSX achieves a -50.80% return, which is significantly lower than IBTJ's 0.04% return.
BSX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -10.95%
- YTD
- -50.80%
- 6M
- -49.33%
- 1Y
- -52.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
IBTJ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
BSX vs. IBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSX Boston Scientific Corporation | -50.80% | 6.75% | 54.51% | 24.94% | 8.92% | 18.16% | -5.20% |
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 0.04% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -3.57% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSX and IBTJ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BSX and IBTJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSX vs. IBTJ — Risk / Return Rank
BSX
IBTJ
BSX vs. IBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSX | IBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.67 | 1.25 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 2.02 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | 5.49 | -7.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSX vs. IBTJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSX drawdown since its inception was -89.15%, which is greater than IBTJ's maximum drawdown of -20.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSX and IBTJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSX | IBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.15% | -20.19% | -68.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.62% | -1.62% | -55.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.62% | -4.43% | -52.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.62% | -17.21% | -39.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.62% | -6.17% | -50.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -9.71% | -29.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.23% | 0.59% | +25.64% |
Volatility
BSX vs. IBTJ - Volatility Comparison
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) at 0.69%. This indicates that BSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSX | IBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.84% | 0.69% | +15.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 1.58% | +31.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.77% | 2.36% | +32.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 5.73% | +19.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 5.98% | +21.31% |
Dividends
BSX vs. IBTJ - Dividend Comparison
BSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSX Boston Scientific Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSX and IBTJ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSX has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSX dropped -89.15% vs IBTJ's -20.19%.
IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSX and IBTJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer