BSVO vs. AVDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSVO returned 19.92%/yr vs 27.46%/yr for AVDV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSVO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.

Performance

BSVO vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 13.23% return.

BSVO

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 22.35%
• 6M: 20.39%
• 1Y: 44.28%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVDV

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 13.23%
• 6M: 12.69%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 27.46%
• 5Y*: 13.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSVO vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	22.35%	9.21%	4.68%	21.95%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	13.23%	49.37%	8.67%	11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and AVDV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023	0.61

The correlation between BSVO and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSVO	AVDV
Financial Services	33.1%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	15.4%
Energy	14.2%	9.6%
Industrials	13.2%	22.8%
Basic Materials	6.0%	21.0%
Technology	5.7%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	3.4%
Communication Services	4.1%	2.4%
Healthcare	3.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.3%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

BSVO vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSVO

BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 81
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

AVDV

AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 74
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSVO vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSVO	AVDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.50	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	3.29	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	3.11	+2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.22	12.36	+2.87

BSVO vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and AVDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSVO	AVDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.67%	-43.01%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-13.19%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	-14.17%	-14.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-3.73%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-6.74%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	3.31%	-0.39%

Volatility

BSVO vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is 4.98%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that BSVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSVO	AVDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	6.23%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.19%	14.14%	-1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.98%	16.42%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	17.41%	+4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.65%	19.76%	+1.89%

BSVO vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSVO vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than AVDV's 4.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	4.17%	3.05%	4.31%	3.29%	3.17%	2.39%	1.67%	0.36%
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	1.24%	1.52%	1.61%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSVO and AVDV in my portfolio?

BSVO and AVDV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSVO or AVDV?

AVDV has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to BSVO (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

Which ETF is better, BSVO or AVDV?

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 27.46% vs 19.92% for BSVO. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BSVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSVO or AVDV?

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 27.46% return vs 19.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSVO or AVDV?

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSVO or AVDV?

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 1.24% for BSVO.

What is the main difference between BSVO and AVDV?

BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.36% for AVDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.