BSV vs. DDV
BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. BSV is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
BSV vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.37% return.
BSV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.92%
DDV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSV vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.46% | 0.58% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.37% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSV and DDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSV vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
BSV
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSV vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSV | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSV vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSV | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -1.92% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.28% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -0.34% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | — | — |
Volatility
BSV vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSV | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83% | 2.68% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 2.68% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 2.68% | -0.30% |
BSV vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSV vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.02% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.62% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSV and DDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
BSV has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.
BSV is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BSV and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for BSV and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer